|
Premier Sponsors:
|
|
 |
|
Corporate
Sponsors: |
|

|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
Corporate
Donors: |
 |
 |
|
Sponsoring Publications: |
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|

|
|

|
 |
|
Lead
Web Partner: |
 |
|
Web Partners: |
|

|
|

|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
Day One:
Monday, February 23
7:30-8:30 Coffee and
Registration
8:30-8:40 Chairperson’s
Remarks
Assistant Professor R. Kip Guy, Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
Director, Bay Area Screening Center; Director, Center for Chemical
Diversity, UCSF
8:40-9:25 Keynote Address:
 |
Chemical and Biological
Approaches for the Preparation of Libraries
Professor Kim D. Janda, Department of Chemistry,
Ely
R. Callaway, Jr., Chair in Chemistry, The Scripps Research
Institute |
|
Past and recent investigations of our work based on the
preparation and screening of chemical and biological libraries
will be presented. When appropriate, an emphasis will be placed on
screening of these libraries for the identification of biological
activity. |
|
Diversity-Oriented Synthesis
versus Target-Oriented Synthesis
9:25-9:55 RADDAR-a New
Paradigm for Hit & Lead Creation
Dr. Konrad Bleicher, Head of Combinatorial Chemistry, F.
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division Lead Generation
Roche Adaptive Drug Design And Refinement is the consequent
integration of library design, combinatorial chemistry and
compound testing (multidimensional optimization) for the
generation of targeted, high-quality, compound libraries. The
successful application of this approach will be discussed using
both solution and solid phase chemistry technologies. The impact
of RADDAR within a chemogenomics platform will also be addressed.
9:55-10:25 Diversity-Oriented
Libraries Tailored for Forward Chemical Genetics
Dr. John A. Tallarico, Head of Chemical Technology, Harvard
Institute of Chemistry and Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School
Ongoing research towards the development and realization of
skeletally diverse, split-pool libraries will be presented. Our
strategies will be discussed in detail and several screening
results will be included from in vitro and whole cellular assays.
10:25-10:55 Networking Coffee
Break
10:55-11:25 Affinity Screening
and Mixture-Based Libraries
Dr. Steven P. Adams, Chief Scientific Officer, Neogenesis
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
11:25-11:55 Is Maximizing
Diversity in Library Synthesis Useful?
Dr. Anil Nair, Senior Scientist, Aventis Combinatorial
Technology Center
Design of chemical libraries involves several aspects such as
lead-like properties, target/target-family relevant chemical
space, synthetic feasibility, etc. Maximizing diversity around a
chemical scaffold (chemotype) has to be balanced against above
parameters, particularly conformational flexibility of compounds.
In addition, limitations of high throughput screening capabilities
and cost of synthesis also play important roles while designing
libraries. The diversity aspect in library design will be
discussed with case studies involving kinase and GPCR targets with
focused and generic libraries.
11:55-12:25 DOS versus TOS
Panel Discussion
12:25-2:00 Lunch on your own
(technology workshop, sponsorship available)
Library Design
Addressing the Trend Toward Smaller,
More Focussed Libraries
for Drug Discovery
2:00-2:10 Chairperson's
remarks
Dr. Aubrey Mendonca, VP Business Development, Polymer
Laboratories
2:10-2:40 Discovery of Ligands
for Melanocortin Receptors
Dr. Matthew Fisher, Head, Discovery Chemistry Research -
Lead Generation Lilly Research Laboratories
A survey of ligands for a variety of G-Coupled Protein
Receptors (GPCR's) reveals striking structural similarities. Use
of these common structural motifs (privileged structures) as key
diversity elements in new compound libraries has proven to be an
effective strategy for the identification of novel ligands for
GPCR's. The melanocortin receptors belong to the Class A family of
GPCR's and have generated sufficient interest for a variety of
clinically relevant indications. Our presentation will describe
our approach to the identification of lead structures for these
receptors and to highlight the use of privileged structures in
GPCR ligand design.
2:40-3:10 Design and Synthesis
of a Lead Generation Library Targeting Protein-Protein
Interactions
Dr. Jürgen Hinrichs, Laboratory Head, Combinatorial
Chemistry Unit, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research
Natural and synthetic structures based on a cyclic peptide
chain connected to a biaryl moiety have been shown to possess
potent biological activities. To overcome the limitations of
alpha-peptidic structures, like low bioavailability and easy
proteolysis, we have designed peptido-mimetic macrocycles
containing beta-amino acids. Whereas the tripeptide can mimic a
beta-turn, the biaryl part (with the appropriate substitution
pattern) should be capable of acting like an alpha-helix. We will
report the development of a solid-phase protocol for the synthesis
of biaryl-containing macrocyclic beta-peptides, aiming to
interrupt protein-protein interactions.
3:10-3:40 Knowledge Integrated
Multiparametric Library Design
Dr. M. Patek, Senior Research Scientist, Selectide-Aventis
Combinatorial and Technology Center, Aventis Pharmaceuticals
In the process of a library design, one frequently faces a
competing nature of important library criteria. New approaches to
the combinatorial library design are thus highly desirable. As a
part of the integrated library design program, we were focusing on
the major challenge, specifically, how to efficiently and most
objectively optimize the library size and format simultaneously
with other important properties such as diversity, compound
properties, reagent reactivity, and cost. The adaptation of a
multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and multiple weighted
inputs to the library design is presented, that results in a
family of solutions and provides users with informed choices at
any stage of the drug discovery process.
3:40-4:10 Networking
Refreshment Break
4:10-4:40 Nonleadlikeness and
Leadlikeness in Biochemical Screening
Dr. Gilbert M. Rishton, Research Scientist, Amgen
Biochemical assays have largely supplanted functional
biological assays as drug screening tools in the early stages of
drug discovery. The de-selection of compounds that are "nonleadlike"
binders (and bonders) and the proactive selection of those
compounds that are "leadlike" in their binding to the
target are vital components of the screening effort. The
physiochemical properties of leadlikeness and the surprising
differences between those properties and the now classical
definitions of druglikeness are becoming apparent.
4:40-5:10
A Computer
Based Strategy for Synthesizing
Structurally Diverse Compound Sets
Dr. William F. Michne, Senior Principal Scientist,
AstraZeneca
High throughput screening of corporate compound collections is
pro-ducing large numbers of hits for which bulk solid sample is
not available for further study. Taken individually the compounds
are for the most part readily resynthesized. However, given the
large and growing numbers of such compounds, coupled with their
overall structural diversity, the resyn thesis of these compounds
is generally considered impractical. As result, the compounds are
ignored, quite possibly leaving many valuable drugs undiscovered
in the longer term. We are exploring methods for developing
"synthesis matrices" for structurally diverse compound
sets that allow many reactions to be compressed into a smaller
number of syn-thetic operations, thereby making the preparation of
a large percentage these compounds a realistic exercise.
5:10-540 Panel Discussion
5:40-6:30 Reception, Exhibit
and Poster Viewing
Sponsored by

6:40 Close of Day
|