|
Tuesday, March 20
7:30-8:30 Conference Registration and Morning Coffee
8:30-8:40 Welcoming Remarks from Conference Director
Julia Boguslavsky, Cambridge Healthtech Institute
Biomarkers in Translational Medicine and Early Clinical Trials
8:40-8:45 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks
8:45-9:15 Global Oncology Translational Medicine Lead
Dominic Spinella, Ph.D., Senior Director, Translational Medicine, Global
Oncology Lead, Pfizer, Inc.
The use of preclinical biomarkers in oncology, and their
translation to clinical drug development, presents some unique challenges.
Molecular and pharmacodynamic endpoints assessed in preclinical xenograft models
are difficult to obtain in the clinic for a variety of reasons and are in any
case only poorly correlated to the ultimate clinical endpoint of survival. This
talk will outline Pfizer’s approach to co-developing fit-for-purpose
biomarkers along with oncology drugs and discuss how they are used for internal
decision making relating to project progression throughout preclinical and
clinical development.
9:15-9:45 Biomarker Modules: A Paradigm for Biomarker
Selection in Osteoarthritis and Other Challenging Diseases
Mark Downey-Jones, Team Leader, Translational Science, Respiratory &
Inflammation Research, AstraZeneca R&D
In diseases such as osteoarthritis biomarkers are urgently
needed, but still the jury is out regarding their clinical applicability and
experimental robustness. With phase II studies taking up to two years and
joint-space narrowing being the key clinical measure a panel of biomarkers which
can predict early disease modification will greatly reduce trial duration and
enable improved decision-making. This presentation will outline a modular
biochemical biomarker approach to osteoarthritis, which could apply to other
challenging diseases.
9:45-10:00
Message from the Sponsor
Pharma-to-Dx Convergence: Market Developments in the Emerging Era of Diagnostics
David Hoekzema, Director, Pharmaceutical Market Development, QIAGEN
Inc.
The pharmaceutical industry is currently accelerating its focus on the co-development and co-validation of biomarker assays with therapeutics. There are reports which provide
favorable evidence for the value of this approach in drug development, but there are also reports that raise concern and doubt over the "theranostics" model. What is the real evidence
of scientific, business, and regulatory progress toward the advancement of companion diagnostics with therapeutics? What are the leading market developments and
prospects for the field of biomarkers in 2007, and beyond? |

|
10:00-11:00 Coffee Break with Exhibit and Poster
Viewing
11:00-11:30 Biomarkers in First-in-Human Studies
Dan Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., Director, Medical Sciences, Amgen Inc.
The primary goal of evaluating safety, tolerability and PK
characteristics of investigational drugs in FIH studies can be complemented by
the analyses of molecular biomarkers providing information on the
pharmacodynamic modulation of the therapeutic target. Many of the biomarkers
employed by Amgen in such studies have necessitated the use of novel strategies
and/or technologies. Some of these will be discussed in the context of their
application to current clinical candidates at our company.
11:30-12:00 Using Biomarkers to Detect Signals in
Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease
Douglas Galasko, M.D., Professor, Department of Neuroscience, University of
California, San Diego
Disease-modifying clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease to
date have been unsuccessful. Although cellular and animal models exist to screen
candidate drugs for many targets in AD, translating these findings to clinical
trials is a challenge. Biomarkers using plasma and CSF measures, as well as
neuroimaging modalities, provide tools to characterize whether candidate drugs
hit targets and influence appropriate biological processes in human studies.
Applications of biomarkers to clinical trial designs will be discussed.
|
12:00-12:30 Panel Discussion
Panelists Include:
-
Dominic Spinella, Ph.D., Senior Director, Translational
Medicine, Global Oncology Lead, Pfizer, Inc.
-
Mark Downey-Jones, Ph.D., Team Leader, Translational
Science, Respiratory & Inflammation Research, AstraZeneca R&D
-
Dan Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., Director, Medical Sciences, Amgen
Inc.
-
Douglas Galasko, M.D., Professor, Department of
Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego
Discussion Topics Include:
-
What is the right time to start developing biomarkers?
Which types of biomarkers should be developed at various stages in the drug
pipeline?
-
What kind of biological validation is required to move
the biomarker into the clinic?
-
What strategies help translate biomarkers from
preclinical to clinical development?
-
What type of biomarker data should lead to terminating a
target or a compound? What type of data should lead to increased investment in a
compound?
-
How to get buy-in from the organization? What level of
validation is required for which types of decisions?
|
|
Luncheon Technology Showcase
12:45-1:00 Key Features in Evaluating Potential
Clinical Biomarkers
Michael Spain, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Rules-Based Medicine, Inc.
It is well accepted that using multiple biomarkers simultaneously to
characterize disease and measure drug safety and efficacy are far superior to
single analyte measurements. Only through the stacking of multiple markers can
sensitivity be raised without sacrificing specificity and vice versa. In a
clinical situation one of the difficulties of this approach, however, is whether
a sophisticated algorithm is necessary to analyze the data as opposed to the
more traditional method of using cut-offs. Sample type is also a critical issue
in the identification and validation of biomarkers. Case studies will be shown
of the different methods of data analysis as well as the importance of sample
type.
|
Sponsored by

|
1:00-1:15 Bringing Biomarkers to Life: Clinical
Trials to Diagnostic Commercialization
Terry Robins, Ph.D., Vice President, Research and Development, Pathway
Diagnostics Corp.
Biomarkers represent the interface between the shared goals
of pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies. The goal of pharmaceutical companies
is to develop drugs faster, safer, and targeted to the specific patient
population that will best respond to their drug. The goal of diagnostic
companies is to develop diagnostic products that aid the clinician in selecting
the right drug, or dosing regimen to achieve the best outcome for their
patients. Biomarkers that are identified early during clinical trials can have
profound consequences for successful late stage clinical trials, regulatory
approval, and ultimately the therapeutic impact of the drug. Pathway Diagnostics
specializes in identifying specific biomarkers during the clinical trial process
and following these markers through to diagnostic commercialization. Specific
examples of proprietary companion diagnostics that identify the drug efficacy or
drug toxicity in specific patient populations will be described.
|
Sponsored by

|
|
|
1:15-1:30
Biological Reference Materials for Proteomics Analysis in Clinical Trials
Peter Schulz-Knappe, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, Proteome Sciences |
Sponsored by

|
|
|
|
1:30-1:45 Technology Short Talk
(Sponsorship Available. Contact Arnold Wolfson at 781-972-5431 or
awolfson@healthtech.com)
|
|
Biomarkers to Assess Drug Safety and Efficacy
2:00-2:30 Biomarker Qualification and C-Path's
Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
William B. Mattes, Ph.D., Director of Toxicology, Safe-Path, The Critical
Path Institute
The concern about drug-induced injury and adverse events has
resulted in a wide range of approaches to assure the safety of new medicines.
These include studies in animals before medicines are even used in humans and
monitoring of clinical trials for adverse events. Nonetheless, there is often
ambiguity as to implications of certain findings in animals for human safety. On
the other hand, new drug candidates that appear to be safe in preclinical tests
sometimes show the potential human toxicity in early clinical trials. All in
all, the situation points to the need for new and robust assays and markers of
drug-induced toxicity that may be reliably applied in both preclinical and
clinical studies. The barriers to the development and application of such
biomarkers, however, are two-fold: 1) establishment of convincing body of data
qualifying these biomarkers, and 2) regulatory acceptance of their use. The
clear path to address both barriers is a collaborative sharing of key
qualification data amongst pharmaceutical companies with the advice of
regulatory agencies. The Predictive Safety Testing Consortium (PSTC) has been
organized through the C-Path Institute as a venue for sharing and critically
evaluating qualification data from studies using model as well as proprietary
compounds. It is the access to a wide diversity of treatments and chemical
structures that the Consortium affords, and it is precisely that diversity that
underpins industry and regulatory acceptance of biomarker performance. This talk
will highlight the work of the PSTC and discuss models for biomarker
qualification.
2:30-3:00 Markers of Disease Severity and Drug
Efficacy in Alzheimer's Disease
Paul Kearney, Ph.D, Executive Director, Bioinformatics, Caprion
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Currently, there is not a blood test for Alzheimer's disease
severity which makes diagnosis and assessment of drug efficacy difficult.
Unfortunately, Alzheimer's affects millions of people in the US and the rate is
expected to increase sharply as the population demographic ages. In this
presentation a new methodology for analyzing plasma proteomic data demonstrates
that there is a blood based assay that measures disease severity as accurately
as the current gold standard, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Furthermore, this proteomic assay also measures the efficacy of donepezil (Aricept)
treatment of Alzheimer's patients.
3:00-4:00 Refreshment Break with Exhibit and Poster
Viewing
Biomarkers to Predict Disease Progression
4:00-4:30 Lp-PLA2 - A Novel Biomarker and Target for
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Robert Wolfert, Ph.D., Executive Vice President, R&D, diaDexus Inc.
Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (lp-PLA2) is a novel
enzyme involved in the vascular inflammatory pathway leading to coronary heart
disease and stroke. It has been consistently demonstrated across multiple
published studies that an increase in plasma levels of the biomarker confers a
doubling of risk for heart attack and ischemic stroke, and has been cleared by
the FDA for both clinical indications. In addition, Lp-PLA2 appears to be
involved in the causal pathway of the formation of the vulnerable, rupture-prone
plaque; as such, it is a potential target for direct molecular therapeutic
intervention. This paper will discuss both aspects of clinical medicine,
including the intersection of the diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
4:30-5:00 PC4d is a Risk Factor for Premature and
Severe Stroke
Joseph M. Ahearn, M.D., Co-Director, Lupus Center of Excellence, and
Director, Research, Arthritis Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of
Medicine
We have previously reported that platelets bearing complement
ligand C4d are 99% specific for a diagnosis of lupus, based upon study of over
20 different diseases and healthy controls. The lupus patients positive for PC4d
had a high risk of central nervous system disease. This suggested that PC4d may
also identify patients at high risk of acute ischemia stroke, a disease not
investigated in the original study. We have now prospectively studied PC4d in 80
patients with acute ischemic stroke. Surprisingly, PC4d was significantly
associated with acute ischemic stroke and was significantly correlated with
young age and with more severe stroke. These observations suggest that PC4d may
be a powerful screening test for risk of stroke and prophylactic prevention.
5:00-6:00 Networking Reception with Exhibit and
Poster Viewing
|